AWS CDK Overview, TypeScript and Python Examples and Performance

Nice tool for platform engineering on AWS

Page content

The AWS Cloud Development Kit (AWS CDK) is a framework that enables you to define and provision cloud infrastructure using familiar programming languages like TypeScript, Python, Java and Go.

aws cdk chain of events

This open-source framework simplifies infrastructure as code by allowing you to model AWS resources with high-level constructs, and then synthesizes these into CloudFormation templates for deployment. This makes it easier to develop, deploy, and iterate on your AWS infrastructure in a more maintainable and testable way.

Here are short example snippets for AWS CDK in TypeScript and Python:

TypeScript example:

import * as cdk from 'aws-cdk-lib';
import { Construct } from 'constructs';
import * as s3 from 'aws-cdk-lib/aws-s3';

export class MyStack extends cdk.Stack {
  constructor(scope: Construct, id: string, props?: cdk.StackProps) {
    super(scope, id, props);

    new s3.Bucket(this, 'MyFirstBucket', {
      versioned: true,
      removalPolicy: cdk.RemovalPolicy.DESTROY
    });
  }
}

This example creates an S3 bucket with versioning enabled.

Python example:

from aws_cdk import (
    Stack,
    aws_s3 as s3,
    RemovalPolicy
)
from constructs import Construct

class MyStack(Stack):
    def __init__(self, scope: Construct, id: str, **kwargs):
        super().__init__(scope, id, **kwargs)

        s3.Bucket(self, "MyFirstBucket",
                  versioned=True,
                  removal_policy=RemovalPolicy.DESTROY)

This similarly creates a versioned S3 bucket with a removal policy to delete on stack deletion.

These examples illustrate how AWS CDK uses familiar language constructs, classes, and objects to define infrastructure, which then can be deployed easily via cdk deploy.

AWS CDK supports other resources and more complex infrastructure patterns beyond these simple examples. It also integrates well with IDEs, testing frameworks, and CI/CD pipelines to improve developer experience and automation.

TypeScript vs Python for AWS CDK

TypeScript and Python are both fully supported languages for AWS CDK development and deployment, but they have some notable differences:

TypeScript

  • AWS CDK is originally implemented in TypeScript, which provides native type checking, interfaces, and strong static typing.
  • TypeScript benefits from the most comprehensive official documentation, examples, and community support. This makes it easier to find resources and troubleshoot issues.
  • IDEs like Visual Studio Code offer excellent TypeScript support with smart completions, error highlighting, and refactoring.
  • Because CDK itself is written in TypeScript, usage tends to feel more “native” and smooth with fewer abstractions.
  • TypeScript’s static typing catches many issues early at build time, avoiding some runtime errors.
  • Developers who want strict type safety and larger community resources may prefer TypeScript for CDK.

Python

  • Python support is stable and fully functional but is a binding over the TypeScript core via jsii, relying on dynamic typing with optional type hints.
  • Python uses snake_case naming conventions instead of TypeScript’s camelCase, so minor syntax adjustments are needed when translating examples.
  • Python has fewer official examples and community resources, which can make learning and debugging harder for beginners.
  • Dynamic typing means some type errors appear only at runtime rather than compile time, potentially causing delayed error detection. However, Python modules have type annotations that can be used with IDEs or static analysis tools like MyPy.
  • Python developers appreciate familiar tooling such as virtual environments (virtualenv) and pip for package management.
  • Python is preferred if your team or project is already heavily Python-based, even though documentation and community support are somewhat lighter.

Development and Deployment

  • The CDK Toolkit (cdk deploy) works the same regardless of language choice since CDK synthesizes AWS CloudFormation templates under the hood.
  • Both languages support the full breadth of AWS resources and constructs.
  • Choosing between them often comes down to your team’s language expertise, available community support, and preference for static vs. dynamic typing.

Summary

  • TypeScript offers the most mature and polished experience with richer documentation, strong typing, and native integration since CDK is built on it.
  • Python offers robust functionality and ease of use for Python programmers but with fewer examples and some additional challenges due to dynamic typing and translations between language idioms.
  • If you want rapid development with extensive resources, TypeScript is often recommended. If your project or team is Python-centric, Python remains a good, fully supported choice despite minor trade-offs.

This aligns with community feedback and official AWS documentation describing their respective pros and cons for AWS CDK development and deployment. Both languages can be used effectively; your choice depends on your priorities for typing discipline, language familiarity, and ecosystem support.

Officially supported languages for AWS CDK

The AWS Cloud Development Kit (AWS CDK) officially supports the following programming languages:

  • TypeScript
  • JavaScript
  • Python
  • Java
  • C# (.NET)
  • Go

These languages are all first-class supported, with the CDK originally developed in TypeScript and then extended to others using a tool called JSII, which generates language bindings to make the CDK feel natural in each language’s syntax and conventions.

Regarding which language is better, it depends on your preferences and context:

  • TypeScript is often recommended as the best choice because AWS CDK is originally built in TypeScript. It has the most mature ecosystem, the richest official documentation, and community examples. Its static typing and strong IDE support improve developer productivity and catch many errors early.

  • Python is a very popular alternative, especially for those coming from a Python background. It has clean syntax making it more intuitive for beginners, though its dynamic typing means some errors are only caught at runtime. Python’s tooling and example availability are solid but not as extensive as TypeScript’s.

  • Java, C#, and Go are fully supported but generally have fewer community examples and somewhat less extensive documentation compared to TypeScript and Python. They are suitable if your team is proficient in those languages.

In summary:

  • TypeScript offers the most native, polished, and widely supported experience for AWS CDK development.
  • Python provides a simpler syntax and beginner-friendly experience with full CDK support, but with slightly less tooling polish.
  • Java, C#, and Go are good options if they fit your existing skills or project requirements but may require more effort to find learning resources.

Your choice should consider your team’s language expertise, the availability of examples and support, and whether you prefer static typing (TypeScript, Java, C#) or dynamic typing (Python). Both TypeScript and Python tend to be the most popular and recommended for AWS CDK projects.

Languages performance in AWS CDK development and deployment

When considering the best performance in AWS CDK development and deployment, it’s important to clarify that the core AWS CDK functionality itself—the synthesis of infrastructure as code into CloudFormation templates and the deployment—is language-agnostic. All supported languages (TypeScript, Python, Java, C#, Go) compile down to the same underlying AWS CloudFormation templates, so runtime performance for deployment does not differ by language.

However, from the perspective of development performance—meaning efficiency, error detection, tooling, and ease of coding—TypeScript is generally regarded as the best performing language environment for AWS CDK:

  • TypeScript is the native language of AWS CDK, originally developed in it. This results in the most seamless tooling, strongest static typing, and earliest error detection during development, making coding faster and less error-prone.
  • The richest documentation, community examples, and IDE support (such as Visual Studio Code smart completions and refactoring) exist for TypeScript, speeding up developer productivity.
  • TypeScript code catches many errors at compile time, avoiding runtime surprises and deployment issues, which speeds up iterative development and debugging.

Python is a very close second for development experience, favored for its simpler, more readable syntax and popularity in DevOps. However, due to its dynamic typing and being a JSII language binding over the TypeScript core, some errors surface only at runtime, which can slow debugging and development slightly.

Other languages like Java, C#, and Go are supported but generally have fewer resources, less mature tooling, and thus may offer less development speed.

Summary:

Aspect TypeScript Python Others (Java, C#, Go)
Native CDK implementation Yes No No
Static typing Strong (compile-time) Dynamic (runtime) Strong (compile-time)
Tooling & IDE support Best (VS Code, Autocomplete) Good, but less mature Less mature
Community/examples Most abundant Good but fewer than TS Limited
Development speed Fast, less error-prone Slower due to dynamic typing Generally slower
Deployment performance Same (CloudFormation output) Same Same

Therefore, TypeScript offers the best development performance with AWS CDK, making infrastructure coding faster, safer, and more efficient. Deployment performance is equivalent across all supported languages since they all produce the same CloudFormation templates.

This aligns with AWS official guidance and broad community experience that highlight TypeScript’s native and optimized support for AWS CDK development. Python remains a strong alternative, especially if your team prefers it or values syntax simplicity. Other languages are viable but usually less optimal for quick development.